FCM (Factor-Criteria-Metrics) model - Revision history

User at 22:51, 17 January 2023

2023-01-17T22:51:58Z

User: The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles).

2021-02-06T15:50:17Z

The LinkTitles extension automatically added links to existing pages (https://github.com/bovender/LinkTitles).

User at 06:49, 24 March 2020

2020-03-24T06:49:31Z

User at 06:49, 24 March 2020

2020-03-24T06:49:00Z

User: Created page with "In the '''FCM (Factor-Criteria-Metrics) model''' the quality of software is decided by some Factors, each Factor is decided by some Criteria, each Criteria is decided by some..."

2020-03-21T04:17:44Z

Created page with "In the '''FCM (Factor-Criteria-Metrics) model''' the quality of software is decided by some Factors, each Factor is decided by some Criteria, each Criteria is decided by some..."

New page

In the '''FCM (Factor-Criteria-Metrics) model''' the quality of software is decided by some Factors, each Factor is decided by some Criteria, each Criteria is decided by some Metrics. The measure method based on Multi-data and Layer has certain likeness with network safety valuation, because the core task of network safety valuation is to measure the target network on the aspects of managing strategy and technique , the two safety valuation factors, whether it matches the request of appointed safety protection grade. In this paper, we proposed a network security evaluation based on Factor-Criteria-Metrics.<ref>Defining FCM (Factor-Criteria-Metrics) model [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/302468372_The_Application_of_Factor-Criteria-Metric_Model_in_Network_Security_Evaluation Zhou Mingji]</ref>

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:51, 17 January 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	In the '''FCM (Factor-Criteria-[[Metrics]]) [[model]]''' the [[quality]] of [[software]] is decided by some Factors, each Factor is decided by some Criteria, each Criteria is decided by some Metrics. The measure method based on Multi-[[data]] and Layer has certain likeness with [[network]] safety valuation, because the core task of network safety valuation is to measure the [[target]] network on the aspects of managing [[strategy]] and technique , the two safety valuation factors, whether it matches the request of appointed safety protection grade. In this paper, we proposed a network security [[evaluation]] based on Factor-Criteria-Metrics.<ref>Defining FCM (Factor-Criteria-Metrics) model [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/302468372_The_Application_of_Factor-Criteria-Metric_Model_in_Network_Security_Evaluation Zhou Mingji]</ref>	+	== What is FCM (Factor-Criteria-Metrics) model? ==
		+
		+	In the '''FCM (Factor-Criteria-Metrics) model''' the [[quality]] of [[software]] is decided by some Factors, each Factor is decided by some Criteria, each Criteria is decided by some Metrics. The measure method based on Multi-data and Layer has certain likeness with network safety valuation, because the core task of network safety valuation is to measure the target network on the aspects of managing strategy and technique , the two safety valuation factors, whether it matches the request of appointed safety protection grade. In this paper, we proposed a network security evaluation based on Factor-Criteria-Metrics.<ref>Defining FCM (Factor-Criteria-Metrics) model [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/302468372_The_Application_of_Factor-Criteria-Metric_Model_in_Network_Security_Evaluation Zhou Mingji]</ref>


Line 6:		Line 8:


−	The model is usually constructed in a tree-like fashion. The upper branches hold important high-level quality factors of software products, such as reliability and [[usability]], that we would like to quantify. Each quality factor is composed of lower-level criteria, such as modularity and data commonality. The criteria are easier to understand and measure than the factors; thus, actual measures (metrics) are proposed for the criteria. The tree describes the pertinent relationships between factors and their dependent criteria, so we can measure the factors in terms of the dependent criteria measures. This notion of divide-and-conquer has been implemented as a [[standard]] approach to measuring software quality [ISO 9126].	+	The model is usually constructed in a tree-like fashion. The upper branches hold important high-level quality factors of software products, such as reliability and usability, that we would like to quantify. Each quality factor is composed of lower-level criteria, such as modularity and data commonality. The criteria are easier to understand and measure than the factors; thus, actual measures (metrics) are proposed for the criteria. The tree describes the pertinent relationships between factors and their dependent criteria, so we can measure the factors in terms of the dependent criteria measures. This notion of divide-and-conquer has been implemented as a standard approach to measuring software quality [ISO 9126].
		+
		+
		+
		+
		+
		+	==See Also==
		+
		+
		+
		+
		+
		+
		+	==References==
		+	<references />

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:50, 6 February 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	In the '''FCM (Factor-Criteria-Metrics) model''' the quality of software is decided by some Factors, each Factor is decided by some Criteria, each Criteria is decided by some Metrics. The measure method based on Multi-data and Layer has certain likeness with network safety valuation, because the core task of network safety valuation is to measure the target network on the aspects of managing strategy and technique , the two safety valuation factors, whether it matches the request of appointed safety protection grade. In this paper, we proposed a network security evaluation based on Factor-Criteria-Metrics.<ref>Defining FCM (Factor-Criteria-Metrics) model [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/302468372_The_Application_of_Factor-Criteria-Metric_Model_in_Network_Security_Evaluation Zhou Mingji]</ref>	+	In the '''FCM (Factor-Criteria-[[Metrics]]) [[model]]''' the [[quality]] of [[software]] is decided by some Factors, each Factor is decided by some Criteria, each Criteria is decided by some Metrics. The measure method based on Multi-[[data]] and Layer has certain likeness with [[network]] safety valuation, because the core task of network safety valuation is to measure the [[target]] network on the aspects of managing [[strategy]] and technique , the two safety valuation factors, whether it matches the request of appointed safety protection grade. In this paper, we proposed a network security [[evaluation]] based on Factor-Criteria-Metrics.<ref>Defining FCM (Factor-Criteria-Metrics) model [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/302468372_The_Application_of_Factor-Criteria-Metric_Model_in_Network_Security_Evaluation Zhou Mingji]</ref>


Line 6:		Line 6:


−	The model is usually constructed in a tree-like fashion. The upper branches hold important high-level quality factors of software products, such as reliability and usability, that we would like to quantify. Each quality factor is composed of lower-level criteria, such as modularity and data commonality. The criteria are easier to understand and measure than the factors; thus, actual measures (metrics) are proposed for the criteria. The tree describes the pertinent relationships between factors and their dependent criteria, so we can measure the factors in terms of the dependent criteria measures. This notion of divide-and-conquer has been implemented as a standard approach to measuring software quality [ISO 9126].	+	The model is usually constructed in a tree-like fashion. The upper branches hold important high-level quality factors of software products, such as reliability and [[usability]], that we would like to quantify. Each quality factor is composed of lower-level criteria, such as modularity and data commonality. The criteria are easier to understand and measure than the factors; thus, actual measures (metrics) are proposed for the criteria. The tree describes the pertinent relationships between factors and their dependent criteria, so we can measure the factors in terms of the dependent criteria measures. This notion of divide-and-conquer has been implemented as a [[standard]] approach to measuring software quality [ISO 9126].

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
-[[File:FCM_Model.gif|200px|FCM (Factor-Criteria-Metrics) Model]]<br />
+[[File:FCM_Model.gif|400px|FCM (Factor-Criteria-Metrics) Model]]<br />
 source: [https://www.eecs.qmul.ac.uk/~norman/papers/qa_metrics_article/section_3_metrics.html Queen Mary University of London]
 The model is usually constructed in a tree-like fashion. The upper branches hold important high-level quality factors of software products, such as reliability and usability, that we would like to quantify. Each quality factor is composed of lower-level criteria, such as modularity and data commonality. The criteria are easier to understand and measure than the factors; thus, actual measures (metrics) are proposed for the criteria. The tree describes the pertinent relationships between factors and their dependent criteria, so we can measure the factors in terms of the dependent criteria measures. This notion of divide-and-conquer has been implemented as a standard approach to measuring software quality [ISO 9126].

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:49, 24 March 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	In the '''FCM (Factor-Criteria-Metrics) model''' the quality of software is decided by some Factors, each Factor is decided by some Criteria, each Criteria is decided by some Metrics. The measure method based on Multi-data and Layer has certain likeness with network safety valuation, because the core task of network safety valuation is to measure the target network on the aspects of managing strategy and technique , the two safety valuation factors, whether it matches the request of appointed safety protection grade. In this paper, we proposed a network security evaluation based on Factor-Criteria-Metrics.<ref>Defining FCM (Factor-Criteria-Metrics) model [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/302468372_The_Application_of_Factor-Criteria-Metric_Model_in_Network_Security_Evaluation Zhou Mingji]</ref>		In the '''FCM (Factor-Criteria-Metrics) model''' the quality of software is decided by some Factors, each Factor is decided by some Criteria, each Criteria is decided by some Metrics. The measure method based on Multi-data and Layer has certain likeness with network safety valuation, because the core task of network safety valuation is to measure the target network on the aspects of managing strategy and technique , the two safety valuation factors, whether it matches the request of appointed safety protection grade. In this paper, we proposed a network security evaluation based on Factor-Criteria-Metrics.<ref>Defining FCM (Factor-Criteria-Metrics) model [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/302468372_The_Application_of_Factor-Criteria-Metric_Model_in_Network_Security_Evaluation Zhou Mingji]</ref>
		+
		+
		+	[[File:FCM_Model.gif\|200px\|FCM (Factor-Criteria-Metrics) Model]]<br />
		+	source: [https://www.eecs.qmul.ac.uk/~norman/papers/qa_metrics_article/section_3_metrics.html Queen Mary University of London]
		+
		+
		+	The model is usually constructed in a tree-like fashion. The upper branches hold important high-level quality factors of software products, such as reliability and usability, that we would like to quantify. Each quality factor is composed of lower-level criteria, such as modularity and data commonality. The criteria are easier to understand and measure than the factors; thus, actual measures (metrics) are proposed for the criteria. The tree describes the pertinent relationships between factors and their dependent criteria, so we can measure the factors in terms of the dependent criteria measures. This notion of divide-and-conquer has been implemented as a standard approach to measuring software quality [ISO 9126].